Officer Detail: William A. Breedlove Jr
Assignment History
Department | Job Title | Badge No. | Unit | Start Date | End Date | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Roanoke City Police | Patrolman/Officer | None | 2006-03-14 | |||
Roanoke City Police | Lieutenant | 2006-03-14 | ||||
Roanoke City Police | Police Lieutenant | Not Sure | Unknown | |||
Richmond Police Department | Police Officer | Major Crimes | Unknown | 2024-01-01 | ||
Roanoke County Police | Police Officer II | None | 2002-11-23 | 2006-03-07 | ||
Richmond Police Department | Patrolman/Officer | None | 1998-03-27 | 2002-11-14 |
Salary
Annual Salary | Overtime & Other Pay | Total Pay | Year |
---|---|---|---|
$66,516.17 | $751.41 | $67,267.58 | FY2023 |
Incidents
Incident USA-v-Robert-Haines-Appeal |
|
Date | Jul 12, 2001 |
Time | 08:30 AM |
Report # | USA-v-Robert-Haines-Appeal |
Department | Richmond Police Department |
Officers | Robert Sprinkle , William A. Breedlove Jr |
Description | "..[T]he district court, in the Suppression Order of November 29, 2001, concluded that “[g]iven the totality of the circumstances known to the officers in this case [Robert S. Sprinkle and Eric Flick], there was not reasonable, articulable suspicion that criminal activity was afoot, sufficient to conduct an investigatory stop of the defendant.' ,.[T]he question of “[w]hether an officer has such reasonable suspicion to justify a stop-and-frisk is subject to de novo review... Pursuant to the Supreme Court’s decision in Terry v. Ohio, law enforcement officers may properly conduct a brief investigative stop of an individual when they possess reasonable suspicion, grounded in specific articulable facts, that he has been, is, or is about to be engaged in criminal activity. On appeal, the Government asserts that the events occurring in connection with the surveillance operation of July 12, 2001, were sufficient to create a reasonable suspicion... The Government maintains that... the district court erred... [W]e agree." |
Address |
1300 block of North 27th St.
Richmond, VA |